Friday, August 01, 2014

Naturalnews website censors comments

In the past few days i have attempted to post comments on certain articles pointing out the scientific errors of their writers. I even provided links to scientific articles refuting their claims and tried explaining the dangers of what they were advocating, but they were deleted. I no longer have any faith in the scientific content of their articles. While i agree with 90% of their views, some things just don't hold up scientifically and the readers should know. The site is morphing itself into being more of a political site, rather than strictly being about healthier living. There is clearly an anti-meat agenda on this site and it is quite sad. Maybe i will start my own site, who knows, but i am no longer supporting that site anymore that seems to be trying to push either a political agenda or their products.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Honest Science at its finest - Former Pfizer representative charged with health care fraud

Former Pfizer representative charged with health care fraud

Dr. Scott S. Reuben, a former member of Pfizer Inc.’s speakers’ bureau accused last year of perpetrating one of the biggest research frauds in medical history, was charged today in a federal court in Boston with falsifying medical research studies.

Reuben, formerly chief of acute pain at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., faces up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

U.S. Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz accused Reuben of accepting a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to research the effectiveness of pain medication Celebrex for a 2005 study in which no patients were actually enrolled. Prosecutors allege that Reuben made up the data, which he subsequently published in the medical journal "Anesthesia & Analgesia."

The data supported the conclusion that Celebrex was effective in helping post-operative patients who had received a particular type of knee surgery on the anterior cruciate ligament. "Anesthesia & Analgesia" later had to retract 10 papers written by Reuben, and medical experts at the time said at least 21 journal articles by the anesthesiologist appeared to be fabricated.

Reuben’s studies had been considered pioneering at the time they were published. His data had supported the use of two of Pfizer’s major products — Celebrex and Lyrica — in combination to treat certain types of post-operative pain.

Pfizer said it had supported five of Reuben’s research initiatives. Pfizer, which declined at the time to reveal how much it paid Reuben over the years to be part of its speakers’ bureau, said the company played no part in the fraud.

Last March, Reuben was dismissed from his position at Baystate Medical Center after an audit revealed he had been inventing data for as many as 13 years.

This doesn't surprise me at all.  There is so much fraud in science that it is just plain sad.  The primary goal of most pharmaceutical companies is to make lots of money, not necessarily to treat any particular disease.  Since patents run out after a period of time, pharmaceutical companies need to continually push new drugs for the same diseases, even when previous drugs work perfectly fine.  Take birth control for example, the pills invented decades ago work perfectly fine, but they no longer rake in huge profits for drug companies, hence the creation of things such as Yaz that you see commercials for.

Some of these new drugs don't really have any effect on curing anything, hence the need for publishing fraudulent research studies "proving" the efficacy of their new drugs.  

But fraud in science doesn't just stop with drug companies, many scientists in public and private institutions also commit fraud.  The environment in science today favors arrogant, cheating personality types that are obsessed with keeping their peers down.  Some of the biggest asses I know are scientists, they won't hesitate to lie, cheat and steal just to get ahead of others or publish their paper in a "top tier" journal.  Clout and politics lands your paper in these journals.  Peer review is completely broken.  Is it really peer review when you can actually request certain reviewers or reject other reviewers for your work?  That's not honest.   The other problem is during the grant review process, competitors get to review your grants, and oftentimes they steal proprietary ideas by having their own lab perform the experiments, while at the same time rejecting your grant.  

Science is completely broken, and I will delve into the Global Warming Hoax and the Suppression of half-century electrogravitics research another time.

Monday, February 01, 2010

Blogging Again, I'm Back!

After an extended hiatus, I have decided that I will be blogging again. However, I have decided that I will be blogging mostly on things that have to do with revealing the truth in matters such as Politics, Science and current events, rather than dealing with the distractions that I posted on before. I hope everyone enjoys the new format